T/CACM 019-2017 Chinese medicine journal publishing guidelines

Scope

Main technical content: Academic journals are the starting point and end point of scientific research. The editorial quality of journals is directly related to the process and quality of scientific research, and plays an important guiding role in research work. For a long time, due to the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) disciplines, there are many problems in TCM journal editing that are difficult to solve with existing standards and norms, which have a negative impact on TCM academic exchanges and heritage work, and also bring certain difficulties to daily editing and publishing, journal review and evaluation work. TCM journal editing norms are an important part of TCM standardization work. In order to strengthen the scientific management of TCM journals in China, promote the standardization and normalization of TCM journal editing, improve the overall academic level of TCM journals, and enhance the overall quality of TCM journal editing teams, based on the characteristics of the discipline, this norm is formulated to provide a reference basis for paper writing, journal editing and publishing work in this field. According to relevant national standards and normative documents related to editing and publishing, this norm is developed. This norm incorporates 35 national standards and 6 industry standards as normative reference documents. To facilitate users' access, some commonly used content clauses in standards and normative documents are included in this norm, and the standardized names of traditional Chinese medicines and the citation formats of common references in the Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China are listed in the appendix.

Development Information

Related Standards