T/CACM 1325-2019 Guidelines for Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy of Stable Angina Pectoris of Coronary Heart Disease

Scope

Main technical content: Coronary heart disease is the disease with the highest mortality rate worldwide, and the global prevalence of the disease is approximately 110 million. Modern medicine has played an important role in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, but it still cannot fully meet the current clinical diagnosis and treatment needs of coronary heart disease. Traditional Chinese medicine has accumulated a large amount of clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease and achieved unique therapeutic effects. In order to further standardize the diagnosis and treatment of stable angina pectoris in coronary heart disease and promote the improvement of the clinical diagnosis and treatment level of stable angina pectoris in coronary heart disease, in accordance with the guidelines for formulating standards of the World Health Organization, the evaluation of evidence recommendation grading, and the GRADE series of methodological articles, as well as the management methods of group standards of the Chinese Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and combining the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment and the actual situation in China, this standard was formulated. The evidence quality and recommendation strength of this standard use the GRADE method. Evidence quality refers to the degree of grasping the authenticity of the predicted value of the combined effect size. The GRADE system divides evidence quality into four levels: high (A), medium (B), low (C), and extremely low (D): High-quality evidence indicates that the result is very certain and the observed value is close to the true value. Further research is unlikely to change the credibility of the observed value; Medium-quality evidence indicates that there is moderate information about the observed value, and the true value may be close to the observed value, but there is still the possibility of differences between the

Development Information

Related Standards