T/CECA-G 0189-2022 Carbon credit rating standard for enterprises

Scope

Main technical content: The evaluation agency shall adopt various methods such as questionnaire survey, interview, literature review, on-site investigation, statistical analysis, third-party reports, and expert consultation to obtain and verify relevant data. The evaluation agency shall follow the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest and establish qualified quality control systems, internal supervision systems, and archival storage systems in accordance with T/CECA-G 0189—20210. Special attention should be paid to the following: (1) Rationally determine the carbon credit evaluation cycle. Based on the characteristics of the evaluation object, such as its scale and life cycle stage, rationally determine the carbon credit evaluation cycle. If the evaluation cycle is multi-year, the weight of each year's evaluation should be reasonably determined. (2) Conduct verification through third-party institutions as appropriate. During the evaluation process, the carbon-related verification reports provided by the enterprise, such as carbon emission verification reports and carbon footprint verification reports, shall be evaluated by third-party institutions recognized by the state and relevant units, and verified in accordance with national, local, group, or international standards (methods). (3) The authority and dynamism of risk data. When evaluating macro-risks, regional risks, and industry risks, the latest risk data recognized by relevant units should be referenced; for carbon asset risk data, the relevant standards for carbon asset management recognized by relevant units should be referenced; for energy data and financial data, officially recognized data can be used.

Development Information

Related Standards