T/XZBX 0186-2026 Active Group standards

T/XZBX 0186-2026 Specification for intelligent retrieval and utilization of the lifecycle of smart project records

Publish Date: 2026-03-16 Implement Date: 2026-04-01 For services related to genuine standard inquiry, procurement, translation, and other related services in China, please Contact Us

Price: $ 20.00

Out of stock

Basic Information

Standard Code: T/XZBX 0186-2026

Standard Type: Group standards

Standard Status: Active

is_force_gb: no

CCS Name: Satellite broadcasting equipment

ICS Name: Comprehensive Application of Information Technology

Publish Date: 2026-03-16

Implement Date: 2026-04-01

Scope

The construction of smart projects has seen rapid development in fields such as engineering construction, urban governance, energy and transportation, water conservancy and municipal services, and industry and parks. The types of archives generated throughout the entire project lifecycle are becoming increasingly diverse, including not only traditional project approval, contract management, design documents, construction process data, supervision and inspection reports, completion acceptance materials, and operation and maintenance handover documents, but also a large amount of digital native data and process data, such as BIM models and their change records, equipment IoT monitoring data, construction images and drone inspection data, quality and safety inspection closed-loop records, intelligent operation and maintenance work orders and alarm logs, digital signatures and electronic certificates, as well as message and approval flow records related to project collaboration platforms. These archives are characterized by "large data volume, scattered sources, complex formats, strong chronological order, dense inter-relatedness, and broad application scenarios". If we still rely mainly on traditional static catalogs and manual retrieval, it is easy to encounter problems such as "unable to find, inaccurate retrieval, incomplete retrieval, and slow retrieval", resulting in low efficiency of archive utilization, high cost of risk tracing, difficulty in reusing experience, and even affecting the definition of project quality responsibilities, investment control audits, regulatory compliance responses, and decision support for operation and maintenance. On the other hand, with the improvement of requirements for electronic document archiving, electronic signatures and stamps, digital delivery, data element governance, and information security compliance, the focus of project archive management is shifting from "collection and storage" to "trustworthy availability, retriev