T/SOECC 010-2023 Active Group standards

T/SOECC 010-2023 Criteria for evaluating well-known brands in the cable industry

T/SOECC 010-2023 Criteria for evaluating well-known brands in the cable industry

Publish Date: 2023-12-26 Implement Date: 2023-12-30 For services related to genuine standard inquiry, procurement, translation, and other related services in China, please Contact Us
Price: $ 20.00
Out of stock

Basic Information

Standard Code: T/SOECC 010-2023
Standard Type: Group standards
Standard Status: Active
is_force_gb: no
CCS Name: -
ICS Name: Cable
Publish Date: 2023-12-26
Implement Date: 2023-12-30

Scope

Scope: This document specifies the terms and definitions, evaluation principles, application conditions, evaluation methods and procedures, evaluation indicators, evaluation scoring, and evaluation reports for the evaluation of well-known brands in the cable industry. This document applies to the evaluation of well-known brands in the cable industry. Main technical content: 1. Scope: This document specifies the terms and definitions, evaluation principles, application conditions, evaluation methods and procedures, evaluation indicators, evaluation scoring, and evaluation reports for the evaluation of well-known brands in the cable industry. This document applies to the evaluation of well-known brands in the cable industry. 2. Normative reference documents: This document does not have any normative reference documents. 3. Terms and definitions: 3.1 Well-known brands in the cable industry: A product brand of an enterprise engaged in cable production and operation, which is used as a carrier of cable products. It refers to an enterprise product brand that has higher product quality, stronger market competitiveness, and better consumer evaluations in terms of product quality, market influence, brand cultivation and management, technological innovation, and brand benefits compared with similar products. 4. Evaluation principles: 4.1 Voluntary and fair: Any enterprise that meets the application conditions may be nominated and recommended by the local municipal associations and then apply to the evaluation committee at the appropriate level. 4.2 Objective and fair: The evaluation committee will review the materials and conduct on-site assessments when necessary, without interference from any organizations or individuals. 4.3 Open and transparent: The evaluation process is open and transparent, and subject to supervision by competent authorities and the public. 4.4 Scientific and standardized: The evaluation indicators and content are scientifically formulated, and the ev

Development Information

Related Standards

Contact Us