T/SATCM 002-2024 Evaluation standards for high-quality development of public Traditional Chinese Medicine hospitals
T/SATCM 002-2024 Evaluation standards for high-quality development of public Traditional Chinese Medicine hospitals
Basic Information
Scope
1. Scope This standard specifies the evaluation requirements, evaluation elements, evaluation organization, evaluation procedures, and continuous improvement for the evaluation of high-quality development of public TCM hospitals. It is primarily applicable to third-party evaluations of the high-quality development level of public TCM hospitals. TCM hospitals include comprehensive TCM hospitals, specialized TCM hospitals, integrated TCM-Western medicine hospitals, and ethnic minority medicine hospitals. 2. Overall Requirements Based on national and regional requirements for the high-quality development of public hospitals and TCM development plans, this standard proposes overall requirements for the evaluation of high-quality development of public TCM hospitals in terms of evaluation elements, evaluation organization, evaluation procedures, and continuous improvement. 3. Main Content (1) Terms and Definitions This section defines the terms used in the standard for tertiary hospitals and secondary hospitals. (2) Evaluation Elements The overall framework of the evaluation elements is based on the "Evaluation Indicators for High-Quality Development of Public Hospitals (Trial)" issued by the state. In terms of the specific setting of evaluation elements, they are refined into three levels, namely first-level indicators, second-level indicators, and third-level indicators. Considering the evaluation objectives, regional characteristics, and differences in hospital levels, the evaluation indicators can be dynamically adjusted and weighted based on actual work needs. First-level and second-level indicators are mandatory evaluation indicators, covering the core content and basic requirements for the high-quality development of public TCM hospitals; third-level indicators are optional evaluation indicators, providing some flexibility and choice space, allowing the evaluation working group to select and supplement them based on actual needs. (3) Evaluation Pr