T/CSES 161-2024 Digital Eco-Civilization Development Evaluation Index System Part 1: Eco-environment
T/CSES 161-2024 Digital Eco-Civilization Development Evaluation Index System Part 1: Eco-environment
Basic Information
Scope
Scope: This document specifies the composition of the evaluation index system for the development of digital ecological civilization and the implementation procedures for the evaluation of digital ecological civilization development. This document is applicable to the evaluation of the level of digital ecological civilization development in various regions and to guiding localities in the construction of digital ecological civilization. Main technical content: The main body of this standard consists of 7 parts, with the main content as follows: (1) Preface, which sets forth the provisions for the preparation of the standard, the proposing unit, the responsible unit, the participating units, and the participating personnel, etc. (2) Introduction, which summarizes the preparation background, basis, and content of the standard. (3) Scope, which outlines the content and applicability of this standard. This document specifies the composition of the evaluation index system for the development of digital ecological civilization and the implementation procedures for the evaluation of digital ecological civilization development. This document is applicable to the evaluation of the level of digital ecological civilization development in various regions and to guiding localities in the construction of digital ecological civilization. (In this section, "various regions" primarily refers to local ecological environmental authorities. In the second paragraph of the draft stage of this standard, it was described as "This document is applicable to the evaluation of the level of digital ecological civilization development in various departments and regions and to guiding localities in the construction of digital ecological civilization." During the public consultation stage, some feedback suggested that the interpretation of "various departments and regions" was inaccurate. After in-depth discussion by the drafting group, it was revised to "various regions"). (4) Normative reference