T/DZJN 55-2021 Evaluation Requirements for Green Factories of Power Lithium-ion Battery Recycling Enterprises
T/DZJN 55-2021
Basic Information
Scope
Main Technical Content: 4 General Principles 4.1 Evaluation Principles 4.1.1 Consistency Principle The overall evaluation structure shall be consistent with the relevant evaluation index system and requirements proposed in GB/T 36132. 4.1.2 Industry-Specific Principle The evaluation requirements shall highlight the characteristics of the power lithium-ion battery recycling industry on the basis of GB/T 36132. 4.1.3 Systematic Principle The evaluation indicators shall adopt a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as a combination of process and performance, to form a complete comprehensive evaluation index system. 4.2 Evaluation Indicators 4.2.1 Evaluation Index System The evaluation index system includes first-level indicators and second-level indicators. The first-level indicators include basic requirements, infrastructure, management systems, energy and resource input, products, environmental emissions, and performance, with several second-level indicators under each first-level indicator. The second-level indicators specify specific evaluation requirements. Basic requirements are the basic conditions for factories to participate in the evaluation and are not scored; the other six aspects are specific evaluation requirements, through which the degree to which factories meet the requirements is assessed. The framework of the green factory evaluation system is shown in Figure 1. Specific evaluation requirements are divided into mandatory requirements and optional requirements. Mandatory requirements are the basic requirements that factories should meet, and factories cannot be evaluated as green factories if they fail to meet these requirements. Optional requirements are the improvement requirements that factories are encouraged to strive to meet, which are advanced in nature, and the degree of meeting these requirements shall be determined based on the actual situation of the evaluated factories. Figure 1: Framework