T/LNJZFS 001-2024 Active Group standards

T/LNJZFS 001-2024 Guidelines for Quality Integrity Assessment in Architectural Waterproofing Industry

T/LNJZFS 001-2024 Guidelines for Quality Integrity Assessment in Architectural Waterproofing Industry

Publish Date: 2024-04-10 Implement Date: 2024-05-10 For services related to genuine standard inquiry, procurement, translation, and other related services in China, please Contact Us
Price: $ 20.00
Out of stock

Basic Information

Standard Code: T/LNJZFS 001-2024
Standard Type: Group standards
Standard Status: Active
is_force_gb: no
CCS Name: -
ICS Name: Other standards related to quality
Publish Date: 2024-04-10
Implement Date: 2024-05-10

Scope

Scope: This document specifies the terms and definitions, evaluation principles, evaluation qualifications, evaluation indicators, evaluation methods, evaluation procedures, evaluation grades, and work management for the quality and integrity evaluation of building waterproofing material production enterprises and building waterproofing engineering construction enterprises. Main technical content: 6. The quality and integrity evaluation indicators include seven aspects: qualification evaluation, quality evaluation, market evaluation, social evaluation, development evaluation, integrity evaluation, and bonus evaluation. See Appendix A, the "Quality and Integrity Evaluation Scoring Table for the Building Waterproofing Industry in Liaoning Province". 7. Based on the application materials and scoring table, the evaluation expert group scores by means of observation, comparison, and verification to obtain objective evidence. For evaluation indicators that cannot be directly quantified and special situations encountered during the evaluation process, the evaluation expert group shall make a determination. Based on the scoring results, a conclusion on the quality and integrity evaluation is drawn. 8. Evaluation procedures: The quality and integrity evaluation of the building waterproofing industry follows the following procedures: a) Enterprise application; b) Document review; c) On-site verification; d) Evaluation by the expert group; e) Grade evaluation; f) Public announcement. 9. Evaluation grades: The evaluation grades in this document are divided into five levels: AAAA, AA, A, B, and C, with each 100 points corresponding to one grade difference. The grading of the quality and integrity evaluation is shown in Appendix B.

Development Information

Related Standards

Contact Us