T/CI 086-2023 "Assessment technical standards for unsafe behavior and conditions of deck department duty personnel"
T/CI 086-2023 "Assessment technical standards for unsafe behavior and conditions of deck department duty personnel"
Basic Information
Scope
Scope: This document provides a technical method for assessing unsafe behaviors and states of deck duty crew members. This document is applicable to personnel who have obtained a seafarer's competency certificate in accordance with the provisions of the "Regulations on Seafarers of the People's Republic of China", including captains, pilots, and ordinary crew members. The method proposed in this document is applicable to ship bridges. Bridge operations involve multiple scenarios and have all-weather characteristics, requiring more complex assessment techniques and equipment, which should be implemented as a high priority. The method proposed in this document is also applicable to other workplaces on ships, such as the fore and aft decks. For example, it can first realize intelligent identification of whether protective gear is worn, and intelligent judgment of the matching between the operating behaviors of fore and aft deck personnel and bridge commands. Main technical content: 4.1 Framework for assessing unsafe behaviors and states of crew members before the assessment Before assessing the unsafe behaviors and states of crew members, it is necessary to first determine the objects to be assessed and their boundary conditions or limiting conditions. All available information related to the items to be assessed should be provided to the working group that will conduct the assessment of unsafe behaviors and states. If additional work is needed, the problem description or boundary conditions or limiting conditions should be modified and resubmitted to the assessment working group, and the assessment process can be repeated as needed. 4.2 Establishment of an assessment working group for unsafe behaviors and states An assessment working group for unsafe behaviors and states should be established. The chairperson or coordinator of the working group should generally have relevant experience, be responsible for preparing the work, facilitating teamwork among working group m