T/YNTCA 009-2022 Active Group standards

T/YNTCA 009-2022 Tea value evaluation specification

Publish Date: 2022-10-26 Implement Date: 2022-11-26 For services related to genuine standard inquiry, procurement, translation, and other related services in China, please Contact Us

Price: $ 20.00

Out of stock

Basic Information

Standard Code: T/YNTCA 009-2022

Standard Type: Group standards

Standard Status: Active

is_force_gb: no

CCS Name: Tea products

ICS Name: Tea

Publish Date: 2022-10-26

Implement Date: 2022-11-26

Scope

Scope: This standard specifies the terms and definitions, evaluation factors, evaluation procedures, and evaluation conclusions for tea value assessment. This standard applies to tea value assessment. Main Technical Content: 3.1 Tea value refers to the value composition generated by product value (variety, quality, function, characteristics, and style, etc.), cultural brand value, and other factors. 3.2 Tea value assessment is based on relevant laws, regulations, and asset evaluation standards to analyze the market value of tea at the evaluation reference date for a specific purpose, and to provide conclusions through evaluation procedures. 3.3 The evaluation reference date is the date determined according to the evaluation purpose for assessing the market value of the evaluated object. 3.4 Market value is the estimated amount of value that a willing buyer and a willing seller would obtain in a normal and fair transaction for the evaluated object on the evaluation reference date, assuming that both parties act rationally and without any coercion. 3.5 Evaluation purpose refers to the behavior and process that the evaluation client intends to engage in after the evaluation of the market value of the evaluated object. 3.6 Evaluation object specifically refers to a single or batch of tea items being evaluated. 4 Evaluation Factors 4.1 Determine the evaluation reference date and conduct tea value assessment according to the procedures. 4.2 Evaluation principles include professional rigor, scientific standardization, fairness, and fact-based analysis. 4.3 Evaluation methods include but are not limited to market method, cost method, income method, control chart method, causal analysis method, expert evaluation method, and other evaluation methods. 4.4 Other evaluation methods include regional price correction method, standard price adjustment method, and multiple regression analysis method. 4.5 Evaluators are composed of well-known experts and